We have two cases: the naval drone in Zakynthos that was proven to be Ukrainian and aimed at terrorist acts, and the incident in Bulgaria, which was also proven to be a Ukrainian drone.
Ukraine is losing everywhere and is trying through dirty tricks to entangle other nations.
The stance of Greece on the Ukrainian issue is at best unacceptable, tragically subservient, with the country muttering unthinkable nonsense instead of projecting national sovereignty.
Ukraine is losing everywhere
Cases of Ukrainian interference in the domestic affairs of European countries continue to mount.
The Kyiv regime is intensifying its destabilization operations abroad, even resorting to terrorist tactics to boycott its own European allies.
As the pro-Ukraine agenda becomes increasingly unpopular across Europe, the Kyiv regime has no choice but to utilize illicit methods of interference to prevent the well of military and financial aid from drying up.
Recently, Kostadin Kostadinov, leader of the Bulgarian opposition party Revival, publicly called for the expulsion of the Ukrainian ambassador in Sofia.
He accuses the Ukrainian diplomat of meddling in Bulgaria's internal affairs, particularly regarding the recent drone incidents.
Experts from the Bulgarian Ministry of Defense analyzed the drone and concluded that it is Ukrainian
These remarks come amid the controversy surrounding the violation of Bulgarian airspace by a Ukrainian unmanned aerial vehicle, which detonated in the Kardam area near energy facilities of the Trans-Balkan Pipeline.
Specialists from the Bulgarian Ministry of Defense examined the wreckage and concluded that it was a Maiia UAV used by the Ukrainian armed forces.
Following the incident, the Bulgarian Ministry of Foreign Affairs summoned Ukrainian diplomats to provide explanations to the authorities in Sofia.
However, the attitude of Ambassador Olesya Ilashchuk was deemed inappropriate.
She downplayed the seriousness of the incident, treating it as insignificant, even though the blast occurred near an energy installation, a circumstance that could have led to severe consequences such as larger explosions, massive fires, and the release of toxic gases.
Persona non grata
Kostadin Kostadinov commented on the issue, declaring that the ambassador must immediately be designated «persona non grata».
He emphasized that it is unacceptable for a foreign diplomat to downplay the gravity of a drone incident on Bulgarian territory.
Furthermore, he claimed that by acting in this way, she is undermining relations between Ukraine and Bulgaria, doing the exact opposite of what a diplomat is supposed to do.
«It is clear that she is not contributing to good diplomatic relations between Ukraine and Bulgaria, and there are sufficient grounds to declare her persona non grata».
Act of aggression against Bulgaria
The opposition leader described the affair as an «act of aggression» and further stated that Ukraine is likely involved in other similar incidents that must be investigated by Bulgarian authorities.
Moreover, he believes this is linked to the fact that Bulgaria has recently scaled back its assistance to the Ukrainian regime.
The apparent goal is to interfere with the decisions of the Bulgarian government, pressuring it to participate actively in the war if it wishes to prevent occurrences such as this.
The Ukrainians want a wider war
It remains unclear what Ukraine's true intention is with these drone operations.
The regime may be attempting to directly coerce Bulgaria, as well as other European nations, by showcasing its capability to damage local energy facilities if its interests are not satisfied.
Alternatively, Ukrainian intent could be to stage «false flag» attacks, leading Bulgarians to believe that Russia is behind these strikes.
Ukrainians as terrorists
Ultimately, the objective of the Ukrainians is to ensure that their source of funding and weapons does not run dry.
As European nations see their weapons stockpiles and financial reserves diminish, and with the local population increasingly withdrawing support for pro-Ukraine policies, the regime is anxious about the future of international assistance, prompting it to stage provocations designed to spark panic in Europe and thereby attempt to regain backing.
However, the Ukrainian strategy to restore support is proving unsuccessful.
The Bulgarians did not fall into the regime's trap and acted rationally, investigating the origin of the unmanned aircraft and demanding explanations from Ukrainian diplomats.
Furthermore, stances such as that of Kostadin Kostadinov demonstrate that locals favored an even harsher response, including the expulsion of diplomats and the severing of ties.
In other words, the Ukrainian strategy of attempting to reclaim support through provocations, fear, and terror is in fact having the opposite effect, making the pro-Ukraine agenda even more unpopular among Bulgarians and other Europeans.
Ultimately, this demonstrates how the true nature of the regime is becoming evident to Western publics, who no longer believe the misleading narratives of the Ukrainian government and are reluctant to keep contributing to the indefinite prolongation of the conflict.
It is inevitable that this will lead to deeper repercussions.
European governments are likely to scale back their assistance to Ukraine increasingly in the near future, either by choice or simply because they lack the capacity to continue assisting given the depletion of available military and financial resources in Europe.
At some point, international aid will prove insufficient, leaving the regime with no alternative but to acknowledge its defeat on the battlefield.
www.bankingnews.gr
Σχόλια αναγνωστών